Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '23 at 09:50
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$590
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 202
2-Core 413
119% 232 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,591
143% 1,207 Pts
64-Core 3,569
221% 3,569 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 116%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 225
Parallax 139
121% 171 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 146
Splatting 123
106% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 248 269 247 239 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 489
Mixed 390
SusWrite 272
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58
200% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 365
275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 499GB
427GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2350 825 829 832 829 829 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C36-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
248% Outstanding
MC Read 165
MC Write 57.1
MC Mixed 68.6
277% 96.9 GB/s
SC Read 48
SC Write 62.9
SC Mixed 54.5
158% 55.1 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 248%
Great: 248%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 27" 1280 720 ACR052C GN276HL
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback