Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 21:00
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 159
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 298
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 108
Parallax 67.1
56% 81.5 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 70
Splatting 64.8
55% 67 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BL6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 78 69 73 70 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 338
Write 113
Mixed 107
SusWrite 70.2
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 25.8
104% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 66.8
84% 156 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
589GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 104 107 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 113
Write 122
Mixed 55
SusWrite 105
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TX2400KLN-8GK 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 36.1" 1280 720 RTK0001 RTK TV
Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback