Today's hottest deals

Biostar H510MHP-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 204%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar H510MHP-E  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 13:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900KF
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 181
2-Core 354
109% 206 Pts
4-Core 662
8-Core 982
102% 822 Pts
64-Core 1,267
78% 1,267 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Palit(1569 F302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Lighting 284
Reflection 276
Parallax 328
232% 296 fps
MRender 373
Gravity 249
Splatting 196
214% 272 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 201%
Great: 204%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
788GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0413A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 968 1024 1165 1252 1255 1254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,911
Write 1,304
Mixed 1,082
SusWrite 1153
304% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 27.8
224% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 948
DQ Mixed 565
528% 816 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 252%
Great: 520%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron AFLD416PS1P 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 29.9
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 27.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 100 0" 1280 720 IPS0001 DP
Typical H510MHP-E Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Biostar H510MHP-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback