Today's hottest deals

Biostar H510MHP-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar H510MHP-E  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateJul 06 '24 at 18:34
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900KF
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 183
2-Core 362
112% 212 Pts
4-Core 675
8-Core 1,077
108% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,344
83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$281
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 122
Parallax 127
108% 127 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 105
Splatting 90.7
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
586GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0413A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 812 280 156 271 277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,843
Write 1,347
Mixed 1,001
SusWrite 434
257% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 23.2
153% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 936
DQ Write 978
DQ Mixed 560
531% 825 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 187%
Great: 520%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron AFLD416PS1P 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 28.4
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 28.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 12 120 27" 1920 1009 VSCE439 VX2718 Series
Typical H510MHP-E Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Biostar H510MHP-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback