Today's hottest deals

Infinix INBOOK X2 PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemInfinix INBOOK X2 PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardInfinix EM_TG325_200B_V1.0
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 03:01
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1195G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 63.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 270
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 450
51% 399 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 22.9
15% 22 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 25
Splatting 16.6
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F001T 1TB
919GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1595 2043 1723 2360 2361 2339 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 1,932
Write 2,369
Mixed 1,690
SusWrite 2,070
456% 2,015 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 69.4
292% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,160
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 113
337% 730 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 338%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 35.9
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 15.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07D0
Typical INBOOK X2 PLUS Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Infinix INBOOK X2 PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback