Today's hottest deals

Adreamer LeoBook 16S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAdreamer LeoBook 16S  (all builds)
MotherboardAdreamer LeoBook 16S
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 19:55
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 64.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 282
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 752
76% 614 Pts
64-Core 1,211
75% 1,211 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1C6C A10F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3302
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 13.3
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 24
Splatting 14.4
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F001T 1TB
920GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1103 1030 1005 907 954 736 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,225
Write 1,343
Mixed 982
SusWrite 956
254% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 50.6
188% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 759
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 146
209% 402 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 188%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Longsys Electronics Co Ltd FD4AS3200CQGZZ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 16" 1280 720 CSO160E
Typical LeoBook 16S Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Adreamer LeoBook 16S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback