Acer Predator PO3-650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-650  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-650
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 16:39
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$155
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 67.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 334
95% 184 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,071
107% 872 Pts
64-Core 1,562
97% 1,562 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Sapphire(174B A632) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 166
Parallax 155
135% 163 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 130
Splatting 113
111% 139 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA256TFK 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 286 252 300 217 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 251
Write 929
Mixed 1,282
SusWrite 286
158% 687 MB/s
4K Read 71.2
4K Write 290
4K Mixed 93.6
381% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 1235
DQ Mixed 421
488% 824 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 189%
Great: 245%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB
344GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2975 2769 1609 1611 1611 1614 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
404% Outstanding
Read 2,488
Write 3,001
Mixed 2,942
SusWrite 2,032
591% 2,616 MB/s
4K Read 75.9
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 110
354% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,741
DQ Write 1,391
DQ Mixed 1,554
1,166% 1,562 MB/s
Poor: 252%
This bench: 404%
Great: 489%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
874GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 186 187 186 186 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 181
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 186
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2V48UC8W1-BFES 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 42.3
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 23.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 1280 720 MSI3CB0 MSI G27CQ4
Typical Predator PO3-650 Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 258%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO3-650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $840
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback