Today's hottest deals

Dell Vostro 460

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Vostro 460  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0Y2MRG
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 06:54
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 169
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 405
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 35.8
28% 36 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 25.5
26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 404 433 448 392 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 456
Mixed 428
SusWrite 396
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 42.5
137% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 295
237% 335 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
23GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 451
Mixed 427
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 46.8
156% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 233
212% 322 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 480GB
279GB free, PID 5030
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 28 29 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 56.6
Write 25.9
Mixed 28
SusWrite 27.4
42% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 6
299% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 161%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 9 30 32" 1280 720 XXX0000 TV
Typical Vostro 460 Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback