Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator G3100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator G3100  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3100
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMar 31 '18 at 16:41
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 91.5
44% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 183
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-OEM
Sapphire(174B 5207) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 20.6
15% 22.4 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 23.9
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 102
Mixed 96.7
73% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.19
90% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3100 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback