Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory34.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 16:19
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$177
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 63.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 278
83% 159 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 914
86% 711 Pts
64-Core 1,322
82% 1,322 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 876B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 159
Parallax 155
132% 158 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 150
Splatting 124
121% 152 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,519
Write 2,330
Mixed 1,742
489% 2,197 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 76.8
270% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 1,083
813% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
T-force TM8FP7001T 1TB
894GB free
Firmware: EGFM15.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1981 2193 2209 2192 2201 2320 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 1,797
Write 1763
Mixed 1869
SusWrite 2,183
430% 1,903 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 73.4
229% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 1080
DQ Mixed 1,237
922% 1227 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 331%
Great: 474%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 80 80 80 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 5
Write 26.1
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 80
52% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 F4-3200C16-8GVKB Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 22.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 22
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 54: 0P 5R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 8% 13 198 21 165 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0BA7 XZ320Q P3
History: Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B | Score 54: 0P 5R 7G 8B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback