Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 20:39
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$156
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 169
2-Core 338
104% 196 Pts
4-Core 668
8-Core 1,102
108% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,472
91% 1,472 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q3.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 133
Parallax 230
92% 159 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 122
Splatting 187
145% 176 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDSSDA-1T00 1TB
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 20 19 18 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 346
Write 67.5
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 18.6
26% 121 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 5.8
42% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 37.9
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 24.9
19% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
67GB free
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 280 19 119 19 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 439
Write 386
Mixed 345
SusWrite 151
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 28.5
125% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 43.6
87% 168 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
216GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 141 141 141 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 131
Write 136
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 141
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.8% Very good
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 27.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 29.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 39 144 23.5" 1280 720 VSC0437 VX2458-mhd
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback