Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85FC
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221124
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 14:02
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 194
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 424
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
HP(103C 85FC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.5% Below average
Lighting 47
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 47.5
38% 50.1 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 44.3
36% 43.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 46%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 85FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.53 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 9
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 589 602 623 547 624 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 785
Write 589
Mixed 423
SusWrite 583
133% 595 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 32.4
107% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 517
DQ Mixed 626
452% 583 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 125%
Great: 182%
Micron Crucial X8 SSD 1TB
97GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 320 274 88 77 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 332
Write 320
Mixed 331
SusWrite 188
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 23.5
73% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 112
82% 107 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 92%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
394GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 28 28 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 29
Mixed 16
SusWrite 28.3
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
45% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.9% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 19.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 15.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 21 75 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC20B PHL 245E1
Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx Builds (Compare 5,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback