Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H270-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 13:39
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 115
2-Core 204
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 632
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.7% Very good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 103
Parallax 94.2
76% 96.7 fps
MRender 89.6
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 96.8
78% 95.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-240 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 419 413 378 106 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 335
Mixed 418
SusWrite 306
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 45
169% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 200
164% 230 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 99%
Ne-512 2280 512GB
121GB free
Firmware: V0926A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1104 30 23 368 21 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,632
Write 1,140
Mixed 994
SusWrite 282
225% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 27.8
195% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 291
310% 492 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 165%
Great: 265%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$116
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 170 174 172 176 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 130
Write 164
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 174
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
390% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 20.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 144 24" 1920 1017 AOC246A 2460G4
Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback