Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH570
Memory	22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '23 at 22:34
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-11900H 6,494 User benchmarks, average bench 89% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 63.8 1-Core 142 2-Core 250 82% 152 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 697 75% 596 Pts	64-Core 674 42% 674 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 201A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9778 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	6.18% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 10.6 6% 11.2 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 0 6% 8.63 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 308% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: ERA0901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 279 277 264 289 384 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 1,976 Write 300 Mixed 421 SusWrite 294 161% 748 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 34.9 142% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,096 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 255 280% 499 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 427%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GB 237 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 26.2 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 28.2 SC Mixed 16.1 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	15.5"	1280 720	SDC4143

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	1,180x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples	268x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	541x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	438x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	325x

SSD
CA6-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 308%, 2,261 samples	899x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples	295x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $171Bench 402%, 182,136 samples	48x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	405x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	347x
Key Co Ltd NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBGoldBench 88%, 237 samples	184x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350