Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory43.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 182
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 607
59% 485 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 142
Parallax 131
104% 134 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
102% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 436 442 455 452 456 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 397
Mixed 395
SusWrite 446
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 51.4
173% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 271
223% 318 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 131%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 150 152 150 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 148
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 150
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 86%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$85
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 133 137 135 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 138
Write 70.3
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 136
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 33.1
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 20.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 22" 1280 720 ACI22AA ASUS VW224
Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $948
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback