Emachines ET1861

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemEmachines ET1861  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines ET1861
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 17:10
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 136
56% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 32.4
27% 33.1 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 23.2
25% 31 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF8704RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 134 94 122 127 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 228
Write 189
Mixed 123
SusWrite 123
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 5.5
45% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 91.5
DQ Write 54.1
DQ Mixed 31.4
34% 59 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 56%
Hitachi HDT722516DLA380 165GB-$32
120GB free
Firmware: V43OA96A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 33 33 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 45.6
Write 56.4
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 32.4
32% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
243GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 70 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 69.3
Write 56.1
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 71.6
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 0707 GU512303EP0202 0198 9905403-083.A00LF 0198 9905403-083.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 12.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 50 33.3" 1280 720 CVT1080 CVTE TV
Typical ET1861 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1861

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback