Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 01:21
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 128
58% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 287
30% 244 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.2% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 66
56% 69.3 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 64.5
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 194 166 217 180 268 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 467
Write 415
Mixed 407
SusWrite 204
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 29.5
94% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 87.8
94% 162 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 129%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
24GB free
Firmware: CS900208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 63 111 15 12 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 367
Write 248
Mixed 271
SusWrite 54.4
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 3.7
53% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 27.3
DQ Mixed 20.5
34% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 91%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
182GB free
Firmware: V0915A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 214 297 325 365 363 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 39.3
Write 120
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 280
28% 122 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 12.3
51% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 43
40% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37%
Great: 102%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
263GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 50.7
Write 23
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 21.8
35% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
18% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Ser 1866 CL10 Ser Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0DF3 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback