PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (all builds) |
Memory | 20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150601 |
Uptime | 5.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 09 '23 at 01:21 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 60% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
60.1%
Good
|
58% 93.2 Pts
|
30% 244 Pts
|
19% 310 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.2%
Above average
|
56% 69.3 fps
|
55% 67.1 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 194 166 217 180 268 MB/s
|
69.4%
Good
|
84% 373 MB/s
|
94% 31 MB/s
|
94% 162 MB/s
|
![]() |
36.8%
Below average
|
52% 235 MB/s
|
53% 20.4 MB/s
|
34% 70.6 MB/s
|
![]() Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
182GB free
Firmware: V0915A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 214 297 325 365 363 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
28% 122 MB/s
|
51% 19.4 MB/s
|
40% 59.2 MB/s
|
![]() HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
263GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 22 23 23 MB/s
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
35% 29.3 MB/s
|
18% 0.5 MB/s
|
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 60 | 84.6" | 1280 720 | SAM0DF3 SAMSUNG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 956x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 865x |
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 403x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 284x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 181x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 163x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $366 |