bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory30GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 30GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory19.7 GB free of 30 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201112
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 19:48
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 170
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 598
56% 467 Pts
64-Core 605
38% 605 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 536.25
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.3% Average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 48.6
39% 51.8 fps
MRender 47.9
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 57.7
43% 52.1 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 716
Write 737
Mixed 520
147% 658 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 26.4
85% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 238
182% 250 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 30GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 41.2
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 108%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 DEL4061 VMware VD16:9
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback