Acer Aspire V3-571

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-571  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA50_HC_CR
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 17:46
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 76
2-Core 151
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 349
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0647) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS1TB2G0A-00JH30 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 383 387 349 361 390 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.1% Excellent
Read 475
Write 397
Mixed 344
SusWrite 376
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 28
116% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 46.4
92% 181 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 13
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO22EC
Typical Aspire V3-571 Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback