Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 00:30
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 152
57% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 485
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 59%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.8% Poor
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 128
8% 51.6 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 33.7
52% 68.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fury 256GB 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R6371
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 74 94 24 22 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 302
Write 303
Mixed 277
SusWrite 59.4
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 22.3
82% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 84.1
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 123
114% 168 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
267GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 84 70 94 94 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 81.4
Write 135
Mixed 29
SusWrite 97.2
62% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GVRB F4-3200C16-8GVKB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 22.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 26 144 24.1" 1920 1080 SAC2400 DP
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback