Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 21:33
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N97
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 65.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 174
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 292
42% 308 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Masonsemi SSD 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0816A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 939 963 958 1071 1089 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,196
Write 998
Mixed 851
SusWrite 987
226% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 20.9
126% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 831
DQ Write 613
DQ Mixed 498
433% 647 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 177%
Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4S16G32C22ST 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 17.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 9 60 22" 1280 720 DELD01F DELL E2209W
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback