Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive8.44% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 23:25
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 237
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 887
79% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Apple(106B 020F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.45.40.15
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.6% Below average
Lighting 48
Reflection 51.5
Parallax 70.3
39% 56.6 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 56
Splatting 31.9
35% 43.6 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP4096 4TB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 64 61 59 66 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.44% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 52.2
Mixed 38
SusWrite 58.6
10% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 5.3
11% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A2G8NEA-062E:J 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 25.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 45 60 16" 1280 720 APPA044 Color LCD
Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback