Csl-computer 4936

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCsl-computer 4936  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z590-V
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 11:12
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$225
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 772
77% 630 Pts
64-Core 1,237
77% 1,237 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 9
6% 9.5 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 10
Splatting 7.7
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1994 651 324 346 343 539 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,631
Write 2,097
Mixed 1,724
SusWrite 700
347% 1,538 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 56
242% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 885
682% 935 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 223%
Great: 365%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 93 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 59.2
Write 79
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 93.4
56% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A3 20TB
6.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 40 38 39 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 54.8
Write 36
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 39.3
51% 40 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 1.3
286% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1920 1017 IVM560C PL2409HD
Typical 4936 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Csl-computer 4936

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback