Medionpc MS-7501

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedionpc MS-7501  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7501
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090213
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJan 13 '16 at 22:18
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7750
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 78.4
42% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 75.2
8-Core 65.6
10% 70.4 Pts
64-Core 75.4
5% 75.4 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 555
Nvidia(10DE 0958) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 12
11% 14.1 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 14.5
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 250
Write 161
Mixed 171
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 17.1
79% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 41.2
DQ Mixed 13
16% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
901GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 101
Mixed 100
74% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.33
89% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56%
Great: 58%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
467GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 24.8
Mixed 24.5
32% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.33
84% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 45%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB
459GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 21.9
Mixed 22.4
29% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.31
71% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7501 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7501

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback