Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 09:02
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 61.2
1-Core 189
2-Core 346
102% 199 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 939
95% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,183
73% 1,183 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.1% Very good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 99.3
Parallax 140
73% 110 fps
MRender 78.5
Gravity 104
Splatting 70
68% 84.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 85%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50zns1t02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11200108 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1690 559 401 393 364 355 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,742
Write 1,627
Mixed 1,359
SusWrite 627
300% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 65.7
215% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,044
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 926
637% 804 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 208%
Great: 336%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL3L30CM-BGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 54.5
MC Mixed 45.8
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 41.8
SC Write 64.3
SC Mixed 55.3
154% 53.8 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 31.5" 1280 720 AOCB304 32G3WG3-
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback