Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '24 at 21:14
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 25.7
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 112
44% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 359
44% 334 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3812) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 31.3
17% 19.9 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 32.4
19% 21.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ4X112N 1TB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 808 809 769 697 842 1498 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 2,047
Mixed 1,687
SusWrite 904
358% 1587 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 34.2
150% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 603
428% 556 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 192%
Great: 385%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL3L30CM-BGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 34.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 28.8
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 144 31.5" 1280 753 LEN0001 Go Display
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback