Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 18:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 57.7
1-Core 181
2-Core 339
99% 193 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 873
91% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3812) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.20.24.03
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 56.8
26% 39.1 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 65
39% 45.1 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ4X112N 1TB
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 256 251 292 608 457 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,696
Write 1,585
Mixed 264
SusWrite 333
214% 970 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 4.3
87% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 751
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 174
257% 487 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 140%
Great: 385%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL3L30CM-BGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 44.2
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 36.1
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 41.5
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 31.5" 1280 720 LEN0001 Go Display
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback