Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive441% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B550M DS3H AC  (all builds)
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 18:19
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$133
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 172
2-Core 342
106% 199 Pts
4-Core 669
8-Core 1,011
104% 840 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
Device(1B4C 1522) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 118
Parallax 123
108% 125 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 101
Splatting 87.9
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-1TB 1TB
861GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT4B5.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3052 3185 3206 3224 3222 3226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
441% Outstanding
Read 2,298
Write 3,357
Mixed 2,334
SusWrite 3,186
634% 2,794 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 86.5
310% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,635
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 1,290
969% 1,310 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 441%
Great: 482%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
600GB free
Firmware: VB421D70 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 1046 1046 1046 1043 1047 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,311
Write 1,054
Mixed 1,045
SusWrite 1,045
250% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 42.8
189% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 658
DQ Write 587
DQ Mixed 712
510% 652 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 201%
Great: 310%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
24GB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 127
Write 56.9
Mixed 74.7
98% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 42%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB
1TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.29% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 67.7
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 0.5
54% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 18%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 15 30 9.6 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.5% Poor
Read 120
Write 90.6
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 15.7
91% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 18%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB
753GB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
Read 94.7
Write 89.1
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 3
80% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 18%
TOSHIBA THNSNJ256GCSU 256GB
238GB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 30 60 19 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 116% Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 35.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 37.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 0 36.1" 1280 720 INS4303 NS43DF710NA21
Typical GA-B550M DS3H AC Builds (Compare 1,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback