Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 10:05
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 265
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 783
74% 614 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1381) 1GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1275 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 16.9
15% 17.5 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 16
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY28V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 10 29 45 58 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 396
Write 210
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 38.5
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 2.4
52% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 84.7
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 9.9
49% 106 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 87%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
364GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2272 68 219 69 70 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 569
Write 2,382
Mixed 185
SusWrite 462
205% 900 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 3.6
42% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 257
206% 287 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F0E BenQ RL2450H
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback