Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive464% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 17:50
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$225
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 68.1
1-Core 199
2-Core 399
113% 222 Pts
4-Core 796
8-Core 1,282
128% 1,039 Pts
64-Core 2,323
144% 2,323 Pts
Poor: 118%
This bench: 109%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3083 3262 3149 3199 3287 3059 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2,259
Write 3,660
Mixed 2,554
SusWrite 3,173
661% 2,911 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 97.9
335% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,885
DQ Write 1,527
DQ Mixed 1837
1,340% 1,750 MB/s
Poor: 270%
This bench: 464%
Great: 601%
Corsair Voyager Mini 8GB
3GB free, PID 0b31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.5
Write 3.8
Mixed 7.7
13% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 19.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 25 64 0" 1280 720
Typical TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 246%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $807
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback