MSI B760 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7D98)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics223% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D98
MotherboardMSI B760 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7D98)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '24 at 18:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 213
2-Core 426
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 855
8-Core 1,526
143% 1,190 Pts
64-Core 2,534
157% 2,534 Pts
Poor: 118%
This bench: 118%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$600
Asus(1043 8970) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Lighting 319
Reflection 311
Parallax 331
260% 320 fps
MRender 450
Gravity 262
Splatting 209
239% 307 fps
Poor: 186%
This bench: 223%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,442
Write 2,240
Mixed 1,738
476% 2,140 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 107
363% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,735
DQ Write 1,332
DQ Mixed 1,490
1,126% 1,519 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
SanDisk 3.2 Gen1 125GB
27GB free, PID 55b1
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 342
Write 47.1
Mixed 70.8
138% 153 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
117% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR5 5600 C36 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
161% Outstanding
MC Read 64.8
MC Write 63.4
MC Mixed 60.1
179% 62.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 51.5
SC Mixed 29.5
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 161%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 54 217 57 144 27" 2560 1440 GSM5BB4 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical B760 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7D98) Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B760 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7D98)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 125% - Outstanding Total price: $1,029
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback