MSI MS-16K2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS63VR 6RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16K2  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 21:57
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 174
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 460
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11AD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4617
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 100
Parallax 61
48% 73.5 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 61.1
51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9742
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1519 1531 1690 1821 1826 1837 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,042
Write 1,847
Mixed 1,740
SusWrite 1,704
413% 1,833 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 56
184% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 717
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 523
390% 527 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 266%
Great: 565%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
185GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 115 112 118 117 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 48.6
Write 54.9
Mixed 49
SusWrite 115
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
149% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.M8FB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.1% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 18.8
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD04A7
Typical MS-16K2 Builds (Compare 973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-16K2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback