Today's hottest deals

Medion Crawler E30e

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Crawler E30e  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPxxRNA
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 09:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 233
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 481
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A554) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.3
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-BICS5 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1731 1712 1647 1733 1741 1738 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,067
Write 2,061
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 1,717
361% 1,583 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 45.8
170% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 451
344% 468 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 221%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 37.3
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 24.3
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B07
Typical Crawler E30e Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Crawler E30e

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback