bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Motherboard MZ-B75-S
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210926
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 18:01
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 160
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 415
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.3% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 47.3
Parallax 56.3
35% 48.9 fps
MRender 46.5
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 33.1
33% 41.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XG7000-512 512GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 811 694 751 723 734 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,095
Write 1,018
Mixed 1,031
SusWrite 749
219% 973 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 58
188% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 405
309% 427 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 168%
Great: 414%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 121 115 123 120 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 118
65% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 83%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1TB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 39 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 38
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 39.2
47% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23" 1280 720 ACR01A6 Acer S231HL
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback