Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 15:15
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$499
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 736
70% 578 Pts
64-Core 1,407
87% 1,407 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 115
Parallax 120
102% 120 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 101
Splatting 87.9
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 597 551 553 552 553 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1585
Write 521
Mixed 990
SusWrite 563
202% 915 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 66.9
223% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 765
DQ Write 489
DQ Mixed 262
294% 505 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 195%
Great: 277%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 40TB
37TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 694 668 682 687 674 699 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 731
Write 416
Mixed 138
SusWrite 684
110% 492 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 6.5
33% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 35
DQ Mixed 5.2
27% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85%
Great: 95%
XPG GAMMIX S70 PRO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: A200V9KL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2406 2385 2385 2332 2303 2310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2313
Write 2,448
Mixed 1,992
SusWrite 2,353
514% 2,277 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 84.5
273% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 576
DQ Mixed 768
563% 744 MB/s
Poor: 354%
This bench: 354%
Great: 624%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 25.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 23.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 AUS27A3 VZ27A
Typical TUF GAMING B460-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback