Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200716
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 02:15
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140 16,466 User benchmarks, average bench 81% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 59.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 222 74% 136 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 397 46% 357 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6700 3,011 User benchmarks, average bench 108% PowerColor(148C 2417) ≥ 4GB Ram: 10GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 130 Parallax 229 92% 157 fps	MRender 209 Gravity 118 Splatting 188 141% 172 fps
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 112%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-desire(p) 512G 512GB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400fAA13 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 996 Write 610 Mixed 109 124% 572 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 44.4 136% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 89.5 84% 133 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 205%
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 174GB free Firmware: V8X04c12 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 368 Write 336 Mixed 293 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 27.1 98% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 185 144% 196 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 782GB free Firmware: 00.0NS03 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 85.3 Write 90.7 Mixed 60.1 59% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB 43,162 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	68.1% Good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 27.2 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 23.9 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
9%	11%	28	194	11	144	23.8"	1280 720	SAM710B F24G3xTF

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	13x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	12x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	11x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	12x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x

SSD
SPECTRIX S40G 512GBXPGBench 209%, 26,235 samples	3x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 46%, 6,545 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 84%, 15,358 samples	3x
DDR4 2666 2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 4,790 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16