American X15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAmerican X15  (all builds)
MotherboardAmerican X15
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 17:54
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095A
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 145
49% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 251
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 3
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cf400 512GB 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3215A2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 202
Write 122
Mixed 184
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 1.4
33% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 15.2
44% 93.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x12GB
1 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO21ED
Typical X15 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: American X15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback