Lenovo 82XV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82XV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230719
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 01:20
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 181
2-Core 362
106% 205 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,036
103% 839 Pts
64-Core 1,541
95% 1,541 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3C90) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 26
18% 24.9 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 18.5
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512TFK 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1003V5LN
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,405
Write 2,771
Mixed 1,593
434% 1,923 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 73.6
289% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 885
DQ Mixed 1,098
807% 1,065 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
134% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 48.4
MC Mixed 49
148% 51.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 27.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 134%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0AE3
Typical 82XV Builds (Compare 1,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback