TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 83AL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83AL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230307
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 04:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 68.3
1-Core 193
2-Core 386
110% 216 Pts
4-Core 730
8-Core 1,011
110% 870 Pts
64-Core 1,540
95% 1,540 Pts
Poor: 96% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3803) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 27
Parallax 26
18% 25 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 18.5
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 18.1%
 Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ512MKP1QDY 512GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1L06A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2716 2816 2673 2682 580 498 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 1,844
Write 2,509
Mixed 1,478
SusWrite 1,994
442% 1,956 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 31.4
207% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,798
DQ Write 1,476
DQ Mixed 1,000
923% 1,425 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑
This bench: 328%
 Great: 328%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
152% Outstanding
MC Read 61
MC Write 62.5
MC Mixed 55.6
171% 59.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 51.3
SC Mixed 26.1
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 152%
 Great: 143%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 14" 1280 720 LEN8AAA
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 83AL Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AL

CPU
Core i7-13700HIntelBench 104%, 4,359 samples19x
Core i5-13500HIntelBench 100%, 1,437 samples12x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples19x
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 1,388 samples12x
SSD
PC SN740 SDDPMQD-1T00-1101 1TBWDBench 276%, 275 samples14x
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ4X112N 1TBBench 263%, 615 samples10x
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ4X112N 512GBBench 197%, 254 samples3x
RAM
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 8x2GBMicronBench 127%, 2,615 samples15x
K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GBSamsungBench 116%, 4,018 samples9x
H58G66AK6BX070 8x4GBHynixBench 129%, 170 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback