MSI MS-17H1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT76 Titan DT 9SG
MotherboardMSI MS-17H1  (all builds)
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 10:53
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 990
95% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,526
94% 1,526 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080
MSI(1462 127F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4629
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 166
Parallax 163
136% 165 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 143
Splatting 121
117% 147 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 124%
Great: 126%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$207
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A0S63C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1504 1544 1574 1705 1553 1642 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1153
Write 1,180
Mixed 136
SusWrite 1,587
228% 1,014 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 68.1
218% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 766
DQ Mixed 582
542% 850 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 255%
Great: 379%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
684GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 157 158 152 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59% Above average
Read 49.9
Write 154
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 156
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGSA8M-26N1900 Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 0898 KD4AGSA8M-26N1900 Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 23.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 24.2
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 17.3" 1280 720 AUO509D
Typical MS-17H1 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17H1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback