Dell Precision 7920 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision 7920 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 028PX1
Memory86.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1760 x 990 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 04:36
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6148
CPU0, 2 CPU, 40 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 60.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
69% 128 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 843
75% 633 Pts
64-Core 3,734
231% 3,734 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
XFX(1EAE 7801) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.22001.10001
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
170% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 245
Parallax 467
160% 303 fps
MRender 307
Gravity 304
Splatting 273
239% 295 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 170%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
614GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 1206 1204 1205 1200 1200 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,695
Write 1,378
Mixed 864
SusWrite 1,213
288% 1,287 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 43.7
160% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 619
DQ Mixed 674
505% 674 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 221%
Great: 294%
Nvme CT4000P3 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: R40A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1779 1451 305 304 317 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,531
Write 1,859
Mixed 1,601
SusWrite 744
323% 1,434 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.4
182% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 702
525% 699 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 194%
Great: 524%
Jmicron Tech 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 201 143 199 157 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 464
Write 34.5
Mixed 246
SusWrite 174
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 22
79% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 198
136% 169 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 87%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 118 112 116 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 117
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
291% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK M393A1G40DB... 96GB
2133, 2666, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2133, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 61.7
MC Write 88.5
MC Mixed 78.6
218% 76.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 6.4
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 178%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 65" 1280 720 ONK10C6 AV Receiver
Typical Precision 7920 Tower Builds (Compare 806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Dell Precision 7920 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback