Today's hottest deals

HP G61 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 2%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 1.73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP G61 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 363F
Memory0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 00:37
Run Duration535 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron M100
Socket S1G3, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Memory 1.96
1-Core 7
2-Core 1
2% 3.32 Pts
4-Core 10.2
8-Core 1
1% 5.6 Pts
64-Core 1.5
0% 1.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 363F) 336MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.31%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$80
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 26 31 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 68.4
Write 32.1
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 25.1
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 41%
Flash Disk 3.0 1TB
604GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 3.4 3 2.1 4.1 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 4.7
Mixed 7.1
SusWrite 3
8% 6.07 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T5663RZ3-CF7 Elpida EBE10UE8AFSA-8G-F 3GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 0.3
MC Mixed 0.4
1% 0.33 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 0.1
2% 0.7 GB/s
Latency 488
8% 488 ns
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 18 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD01C2 LP156WH1-TLA3
Typical G61 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP G61 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback