Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210908
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 13:49
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 260
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 785
75% 620 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
ASRock(1849 5210) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 134
Parallax 281
107% 182 fps
MRender 241
Gravity 144
Splatting 200
159% 195 fps
Poor: 117%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
756GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 408 413 429 418 429 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 504
Write 422
Mixed 350
SusWrite 418
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 36.6
124% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 265
195% 263 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 126%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB
3TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 414 413 429 441 440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 436
Mixed 430
SusWrite 425
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 44.7
148% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 218
169% 238 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
236GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 331 330 342 351 350 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66% Good
Read 338
Write 332
Mixed 326
SusWrite 339
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 23.8
82% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 189
129% 158 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-022.A00G 99U5734-036.A00G 9905701-022.A00G 99U5734-036.A00G 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 27.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 ONN0101 ONA24HB19T01
Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback