Asrock B550 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive465% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B550 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220929
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 22:09
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 179
2-Core 352
111% 207 Pts
4-Core 687
8-Core 1,342
120% 1,014 Pts
64-Core 2,302
142% 2,302 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 113
Parallax 117
98% 117 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 105
Splatting 95.3
90% 113 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4132 4270 4138 2618 2429 2625 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
465% Outstanding
Read 2711
Write 4,353
Mixed 3,089
SusWrite 3,369
767% 3,380 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 103
326% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,272
DQ Write 919
DQ Mixed 1,139
839% 1,110 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 465%
Great: 604%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
432GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1126 1156 1161 1161 1161 1160 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,216
Write 1,366
Mixed 960
SusWrite 1154
316% 1,424 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 64.5
215% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,419
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 1,155
887% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 281%
Great: 363%
Amd-raid Array 2 960GB
458GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 193 199 198 198 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 412
Write 442
Mixed 312
SusWrite 199
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 16.7
73% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 64.7
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 24.9
52% 100 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 88%
Amd-raid Array 1 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 179 182 185 185 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 274
Mixed 139
SusWrite 184
177% 242 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.2
321% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 160%
Great: 205%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$76
837GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 94 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 96.8
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 94.6
58% 80 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 60.1
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 45.5
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 41.7
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 26.9" 1280 720 GBT270D M27Q
Typical B550 Taichi Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $922
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $256Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback