Asrock B650M Pro RS WiFi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 216%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 264%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAsrock B650M Pro RS WiFi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M Pro RS WiFi
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 05:23
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$325
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 77.1
1-Core 206
2-Core 415
120% 233 Pts
4-Core 800
8-Core 1,634
143% 1,217 Pts
64-Core 2,899
179% 2,899 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 114%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E438) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 240
Reflection 249
Parallax 518
196% 336 fps
MRender 403
Gravity 210
Splatting 330
257% 314 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 194%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 837 836 839 836 831 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,576
Write 1,742
Mixed 1323
SusWrite 924
313% 1,391 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 78.2
284% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,277
DQ Write 1047
DQ Mixed 1,165
872% 1,163 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 258%
Great: 280%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
931GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 222 220 184 232 232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 463
Write 385
Mixed 157
SusWrite 231
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 16.1
77% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 33
47% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 58%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 493 493 494 494 494 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 487
Mixed 449
SusWrite 493
110% 487 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 43.9
160% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3036F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
146% Outstanding
MC Read 56.7
MC Write 49.9
MC Mixed 51.2
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 47.1
SC Write 55.1
SC Mixed 50.3
145% 50.8 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 146%
Great: 221%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical B650M Pro RS WiFi Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 251%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 255%
UFO

System: Asrock B650M Pro RS WiFi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback