HP Laptop 14-fq0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-fq0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87B7
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210922
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 02:46
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Memory 24.7
1-Core 28.1
2-Core 43.9
20% 32.2 Pts
4-Core 44.3
8-Core 51.6
6% 47.9 Pts
64-Core 22
1% 22 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 87B7) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.58.05
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 1TB
247GB free
Firmware: Y230419a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 154
Write 125
Mixed 151
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 9.7
32% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 94.6
75% 107 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 111%
SDXC Card 513GB
89GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 22 15 26 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.87% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 12.7
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 19.4
19% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 40 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO733C
Typical Laptop 14-fq0xxx Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-fq0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback