Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 281%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics253% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive398% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory50.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 08:04
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 194
2-Core 380
119% 224 Pts
4-Core 714
8-Core 1,196
116% 955 Pts
64-Core 1,745
108% 1,745 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 115%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 471E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
253% Outstanding
Lighting 332
Reflection 445
Parallax 736
270% 504 fps
MRender 478
Gravity 295
Splatting 433
331% 402 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 253%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$112
473GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2830 1945 1832 1890 1867 1890 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 2,694
Write 3,063
Mixed 2,907
SusWrite 2,042
604% 2,677 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 87.6
315% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,702
DQ Write 1,376
DQ Mixed 1532
1,149% 1,537 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 398%
Great: 477%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
287GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1289 1002 997 997 995 994 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,424
Write 2,286
Mixed 2,185
SusWrite 1,046
446% 1,985 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 69.8
261% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,796
DQ Write 1,461
DQ Mixed 1,622
1,216% 1,626 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 313%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
66GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,481
Write 1307
Mixed 1,780
410% 1,856 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 82.9
296% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,747
DQ Write 1,428
DQ Mixed 1,556
1,173% 1,577 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 96 96 96 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 68.9
Write 108
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 95.3
112% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 0.5
318% 3.23 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 8.3
DQ Mixed 0.4
297% 3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 51.2
Write 32.9
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 36
48% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6200C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
223% Outstanding
MC Read 88.1
MC Write 73.9
MC Mixed 84.6
235% 82.2 GB/s
SC Read 59.5
SC Write 72.4
SC Mixed 68.3
191% 66.7 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 155%
This bench: 223%
Great: 223%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 34" 1280 720 IVM761A PL3466WQ
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,096
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback