Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 267%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 343%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics221% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive362% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory53.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '24 at 19:38
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 214
2-Core 429
128% 245 Pts
4-Core 838
8-Core 1,647
147% 1,242 Pts
64-Core 3,835
237% 3,835 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2422) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
221% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 482
Parallax 440
189% 385 fps
MRender 543
Gravity 318
Splatting 487
370% 450 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 221%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2196 2163 2017 2045 2155 2064 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,884
Write 3,875
Mixed 2,978
SusWrite 2,106
669% 2,961 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 65.5
207% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 1,588
DQ Write 829
DQ Mixed 1,318
950% 1,245 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 362%
Great: 587%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
57GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 145
Write 41.4
Mixed 46.3
79% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.7
166% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6000Z30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
194% Outstanding
MC Read 70.6
MC Write 70.1
MC Mixed 69.4
200% 70 GB/s
SC Read 57.4
SC Write 78.3
SC Mixed 64.8
191% 66.8 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 155%
This bench: 194%
Great: 304%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 48.8" 3840 1009 SAME02B Odyssey G95SC
Typical GA-X670E AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback