Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory36.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 11:02
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 265
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 930
86% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,381
86% 1,381 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1395 576 572 579 569 566 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,969
Write 2,300
Mixed 1,830
SusWrite 710
383% 1,702 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 72.5
251% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,145
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 1,050
789% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 247%
Great: 332%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
106GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 428 430 429 432 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 484
Mixed 386
SusWrite 430
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 49.8
180% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 263
206% 279 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 111%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
148GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1560 832 410 243 235 222 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,557
Write 1,717
Mixed 1,360
SusWrite 584
293% 1,304 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 79.4
279% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 1,057
796% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 232%
Great: 276%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
376GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 231 163 163 163 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 486
Mixed 443
SusWrite 228
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 57.3
195% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 275
233% 340 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
Spcc Solid State Disk 2TB
727GB free
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 6 5.5 5.4 4.8 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D/16GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16DZ/16GX 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 32.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 32.1
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 0" 2560 1440
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback