Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics228% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory34.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 06 '24 at 20:21
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 262
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 911
84% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,394
86% 1,394 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$530
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Lighting 319
Reflection 337
Parallax 353
260% 337 fps
MRender 480
Gravity 282
Splatting 227
257% 330 fps
Poor: 182%
This bench: 228%
Great: 232%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1469 460 466 465 479 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,977
Write 2,299
Mixed 1,857
SusWrite 636
380% 1,692 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 74.1
257% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,245
DQ Write 1,046
DQ Mixed 1,130
851% 1,140 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 248%
Great: 332%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
103GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 424 426 399 427 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 449
Mixed 298
SusWrite 422
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 31.6
150% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 176
172% 270 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
180GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1499 829 452 319 302 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,585
Write 1,698
Mixed 1,363
SusWrite 616
295% 1,315 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 79.3
285% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,340
DQ Write 1,015
DQ Mixed 1,191
887% 1,182 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 241%
Great: 276%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
457GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 287 165 162 163 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 493
Mixed 435
SusWrite 219
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 58.7
200% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 373 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%
Spcc Solid State Disk 2TB
222GB free
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2.2 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 558
Write 34
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 1.5
35% 166 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 25.2
90% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 44
DQ Mixed 68.4
62% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 111%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 750 736 738 733 735 737 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 788
Write 760
Mixed 718
SusWrite 738
169% 751 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 84.4
291% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 1452
915% 1,027 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 203%
Great: 623%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D/16GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16DZ/16GX 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 34.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 32
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 54: 0P 5R 9G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 37% 27 211 48 60 27" 2560 1417 LEN66C3 G27q-20
History: Score 30: 0P 4R 2G 4B | Score 41: 0P 4R 4G 9B | Score 54: 0P 5R 9G 2B
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback